PARENTAL ALERT!!
Kids Just The Latest Target of a Corrupt System
PARENTS! You CANNOT afford not to read this!
Please be aware of what is going on in this country. Incidents like these are growing across the country at an alarming rate. If even ONE parent can be spared the hell and anguish of watching their child's life utterly destroyed, then this site has done it's job. These kids' lives are over. Once convicted they will begin serving out the rest of their lives under the social death sentence of being a registered sex offender. Let me reiterate, these are NOT isolated incidents. Click here for more: http://www.ethicaltreatment.org/stories.htm
4 YEAR OLD ACCUSED OF IMPROPERLY TOUCHING TEACHER
by Jennifer Kent
BELLMEAD- A four-year-old hugged his teachers aide and was put into in-school suspension, according to the father. But La Vega school administrators have a different story.
Damarcus Blackwell's four-year-old son was lining-up to get on the bus after school last month, when he was accused of rubbing his face in the chest of a female employee.
The prinicipal of La Vega Primary School sent a letter to the Blackwells that said the pre-kindergartener demonstrated "inappropriate physical behavior interpreted as sexual contact and/or sexual harassment."
Blackwell says it's ridiculous that the aide would misread a hug from a four-year-old. Blackwell wrote to administrators demanding that the whole incident be expunged from his son's academic file because his son is too young to know what it means to act sexually.
David Davis, the executive director of the Advocacy Center in Waco tends to agree with Blackwell. He says assuming the boy has not had sexual encounters, or been inappropriately exposed to pornography, most four-year-olds are sexually innocent.
Blackwell got a response from the La Vega administration. The sexual references on the discipline referral were removed. But the thing that makes Blackwell most upset is they told him "your request for an apology by the aide and removal of all paperwork regarding this incident is denied." Now the young student's file will refer to the incident as "inappropriate physical contact." And Blackwell says he will continue to fight the district.
La Vega I.S.D. administrators told News Channel 25 they couldn't comment on this case because of student privacy issues.
ONE READERS RESPONSE PRETTY MUCH SUMS IT UP:
4 YEAR OLD GETS BOOKED ON SEX OFFENSE CHARGE
We'd like to give "special thanks" to the following people for their incredible dedication to destroying these kids lives. Special thanks to John Walsh and Ernie Allen of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Maureen Kanka, Former Rep. Mark Foley, Rep. James Sensenbrenner, Rep. John McCain, Rep. Orrin Hatch, and all the other congressmen and women who exploit the facts for political and financial gain at the expense of these families. Without your testimony and propaganda such laws would never be possible.
IT'S CASES LIKE THESE THAT SERVE AS A STRIKING EXAMPLE OF WHY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ALL PERSONS MUST BE PROTECTED. THE COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT (I.E. CONSEQUENCES) OF SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION SUCH AS BANISHMNET OF PARKS, SCHOOLS, BEACHES, CITIES, MANY JOBS, AND MOST APARTMENTS WILL APPLY TO THESE KIDS FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES.
ADDITIONALLY, ANY LAW THAT COMES DOWN THE PIKE IN THE FUTURE REGARDING SEX OFFENSES WILL ALSO APPLY RETROACTIVELY TO THESE AND ALL OTHER REGISTERED OFFENDERS (SEE EXPOS FACTO).
THEY WILL BE HUNTED AND HOUNDED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT TIL THE DAY THEY DIE. FOR WHAT?
BELOW (LEFT) JOHN WALSH OF AMERICA'S MOST WANTED AND THE NCMEC WITH FORMER DISGRACED REP. CONGRESSMAN MARK FOLEY(RIGHT). FOLEY IS CURRENTLY UNDER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BY THE FBI AND THE FDLE FOR THE EXPLOITATION OF MINORS ONLINE. MARK FOLEY SPEARHEADED THE ADAM WALSH CHILD PROTECTION ACT PASSED SHORTLY BEFORE THE INVESTIGATION INTO HIS OWN ONLINE IMPROPRIETIES.
AND IN UTAH..... SEX OFFENDER INSANITY-13 YEAR OLD "VICTIM" A SEX OFFENDER TOO
December 8, 2006
Sex Offender Insanity
In a case currently before the Utah Supreme Court, the justices are trying to reconcile a case where a 13 year-old girl has been branded a sex offender:
Utah Supreme Court justices acknowledged Tuesday that they were struggling to wrap their minds around the concept that a 13-year-old Ogden girl could be both an offender and a victim for the same act - in this case, having consensual sex with her 12-year-old boyfriend.
The girl was put in this odd position because she was found guilty of violating a state law that prohibits sex with someone under age 14. She also was the victim in the case against her boyfriend, who was found guilty of the same violation by engaging in sexual activity with her.
"The only thing that comes close to this is dueling," said Justice Michael Wilkins, noting that two people who take 20 paces and then shoot could each be considered both victim and offender.
And Chief Justice Christine Durham wondered if the state Legislature had intended the "peculiar consequence" that a child would have the simultaneous status of a protected person and an alleged perpetrator under the law.
The comments came in oral arguments on a motion asking the high court to overturn the finding of delinquency - the legal term in juvenile court for a conviction - against Z.C., who became pregnant after she and her boyfriend engaged in sex in October 2003.
Yes, that’s right. A 13 year old girl fooled around with her 12 year-old boyfriend and now both of them are being branded as sex offenders and charged with a crime that would a felony if they were adults.
Can this really be what the Utah legislature intended when they passed this law ? The attorney general certainly thinks so:
At Tuesday’s arguments, Matthew Bates, an assistant Utah attorney general, argued the prosecution of the girl was not unreasonable. He said the statute in question is designed to prevent sex with children who are 13 and younger, even if the other person is in the same age group.
By passing that law, legislators were sending a message, Bates said: Sex with or among children is unacceptable.
But can you really say that the law was intended to put 12 and 13 year olds in jail in situations like this ? Mr. Bates may think he’s "protecting the children" by making this argument, what he’s really doing, though, is ruining their lives.
THE ADAM WALSH CHILD PROTECTION ACT TARGETS SEX OFFENDERS. THE LAW WAS NAMED AFTER THE MURDERED SON OF JOHN WALSH. NO EVIDENCE WAS EVER FOUND THAT A SEX OFFENDER WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MURDER OF ADAM WALSH. HIS KILLER REMAINS AT LARGE.
