ASK OPERATIONAWARENESS

HOME  WE'RE MAKING THE NEWS! NEW! FAMILIES IN SOCIAL CRISIS FLORIDA & OKLAHOMA IN THE HOT SEAT GOVERNOR "BOBBY" JINDAL DEVIL'S TRIANGLES U.S. TO MONITOR INTERNET LAWS IN CONFLICT CYBERSTALKING VIGILANTES New! PJ EXPOSE' New! TEEN SEX AND THE LAW New! THE SECOND CHANCE ACT HELP SAVE RICKY JANKRUSKA.INFO NBC "FEELING THE STING A CHILD'S STORY CHILDREN & TEENS ON THE REGISTRY UNSOLVED MURDERS REGISTRY LAWS A DISASTER 2007 -YEAR IN REVIEW KIDS TRY RAISING AWARENESS U.S. ABSTINENCE POLICY MULTIPLE STUDIES EXPOSE FRAUD COMBATTING CYBER-HARASSMENT WILL THE REAL "PREDATOR" PLEASE STAND UP VIGILANTE MURDERS VIGILANTE INFO & TIPLINE KEEPING YOUR KIDS SAFE NBC DATELINE EXPOSED HAPPY HOLIDAYS THE WAR ON FREEDOM & LIBERTY THE MOST WANTED MAN IN AMERICA THE "NO MORE VICTIMS ACT" PERVERTED JUSTICE EXPOSED ZINA LINNIK - TRAGEDY IN TACOMA THE LUNSFORD PARADOX  POLITICAL RED HERRINGS JUSTICE...FLORIDA STYLE MESSAGES OF HATE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE WAG THE BLOG TED NUGENT'S TAKE AZ SENATOR' SON GETS SLAP ON WRIST PAGE-N' MARK FOLEY THE ADAM WALSH ACT WE ARE WHAT WE EAT PROPAGANDA IN POLITICS JUDGE BLOCKS CALIFORNIA'S PROPOSITION 83 CHAOS IN CALIFORNIA REGISTER THIS! JOHN WALSH & The NCMEC AMBER ALERTS TRAGEDY AND TYRANNY WHO IS HANK ASHER? PROPAGANDA IN POLITICS SUFFER THE LITTLE CHILDREN POLITICAL CHICKEN LITTLE PARALELL UNIVERSES ADAM WALSH ACT ...AND THE WITCH HUNT CONTINUES HAPPY HOLI-DAZE ACTIVISM RALLIES PROPAGANDA IN POLITICS SYMPTOMS OF FASCISM SIGNS OF THE TIMES OA RESPONSE TO 10/15 DEADLINE SEX, SCIENCE AND SIN FAVORITE LINKS ABOUT  *NEW* ASK OPERATION AWARENESS WHAT OUR VISITORS ARE SAYING MUST  READ BOOKS CONTACT US

GOT QUESTIONS???

IF YOU HAVE A QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING CHILD SAFETY AND SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ISSUES, OR WOULD LIKE TO SHARE YOUR OPINIONS ON ANY OF THE ISSUES RAISED ON THIS SITE,  PLEASE E-MAIL US.  WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU AND ARE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY AND ALL QUESTIONS. IF WE DO NOT HAVE THE ANSWER, WE WILL DO OUR BEST TO POINT YOU IN THE APPROPRIATE DIRECTION YOU NEED TO GO AND/OR REFER YOU TO OTHER SOURCES. NONE OF THE INFORMATION  PROVIDED SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE.

WE DO OUR BEST TO RESPOND IN A TIMELY MANNER, HOWEVER DUE TO THE LARGE VOLUME OF E-MAILS WE RECIEVE, WE ASK THAT YOU BE PATIENT WHEN AWAITING A RESPONSE.  

E-MAIL US US AT: INFO@OPERATIONAWARENESS.COM 

 WRITE US AND LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD.

QUESTION:

As a homeowner who cannot sell a home due to a next door neighbor who is a sex offender I am looking for some help. Does anyone have any information on the possibility of a lawsuit against a registered sex offender for loss of property value? We are DESPERATE!!

MR.K

ANSWER:
Dear Mr. K,
This is MY opinion. Please don’t construe it as legal advice. Your best bet is to sue the state, for passing these laws without any forethought or statistical data. I don’t think you would have a problem winning a negligence claim against them for that. Again, this is my opinion. These laws should be narrowly tailored to pertain only to those most dangerous offenders, who, in my opinion should not be out on the streets in the first place. As it is now, the category of offenders subjected to registration is too overbroad. Statutory rape cases where the sex was consensual  are one example. Another is children who were caught playing doctor or putting nude photos of themselves up on the internet.
The type of situation you describe is one example of the inherent and obvious result of "Feel Good" legislation. It is ill thought out and designed only to win votes for politicians. It has very little if anything to do with protecting children. 95% of new sex crimes are committed by someone who is NOT a registered sex offender. This is according to the Department of Justice. Therefore, how is the registry really keeping us safe?
The sex offenders themselves did not pass these laws, the state did and so thereby, in my opinion, they are liable for damages. The "right to know" comes with a price tag. Unfortunately it is your neighbor paying the price.
Question:
I am writing concerning the 1000 foot School Safetey Zone restrictions within the Sex Offender Registration statutes. I am on the Registry for a misdemeanor. My one and only contact with the criminal justice system. My offense was possecion only ,of child pornography on my computer in 1998. It was a one time thing and I rightfully so, spent my time in prison and did my supervision period whith no problems and have never had a restriction from being around minors. I comply with all registry requirements and despite the label have managed to keep my family together and lead a productive happy life. While I understand it is the AG's responsibility to enforce the laws the legislature has passed and I have written my legislators as well, I am in need of an explanation which I cant seem to get an answer to.
  Our son who is now 16 is heavily involved in Hgih School activities including athletic events. In order to prevent any problems I contacted the Michigan State Police Registry Department to get a clarification on the School Safetey Zone langauge as it pertains to the definition of "Loiter". I asked if this prohibited me from attending our sons athletic events, dropping off and picking up from, school and parent teacher conferences. The response I got was rather disturbing. I was told they couldnt give me that information and suggested I call the Oakland County Prosecutors offfice or my local police department. I then called my local police department and spoke to the detective who handles the registry administration. He advised me he would have to check into it and get back to me, which he did the next day. I was told that I am not prohibited from attending the school activities. The next day I happened to read a newspaper article from another County where the sherriff stated that someone one the Registry would not be able to step foot on school property for any reason. After reading this I wrote to the Oakland County prosecuters office describing what has transpired and asked for a clarification. Their response was that they could not give me that information and I should obtain an attorney to get a clarification. I can no longer afford to hire an attorney . It is absurd that someone trying to do their best to stay in compliance with these laws cannot get an explanation from someone in a position of authority without having to hire an attorney. I am not a monster nor a predator or pedophile but I will comply with the laws that partain to me. It is bordering on a constitutional issue and I will be pursuing that through the proper channels but for now all I want is a simple clarification of the law. Does the word 'Loiter" prohibit me from being on school grounds for a speceific puropse involving my child? 
ANSWER:
Hi Anthony,
A couple of thoughts, perhaps you could go online to your state's legislative website and look up the definition of "loiter" or "loitering". It seems to me you would be guilty of neither since you have legitimate reasons for being at the school. Additionally, you should not have any problems if you are no longer under any kind of supervised release such as parole or probation. If you are on parole or probation I am certain your po could give you the appropriate answer.
I have not yet seen the statute you are talking about so I am a little unclear as to the intent and wording. I am also not an attorney. I have however been researching these laws for over 15 years now. Let me run your e-mail by e-advocate. He runs the geocities/voicism news and noteworthy articles on sex offenders site. He's quite intelligent and I believe he has some legal background as well.
If you could find me the statute under Michigan revised statutes if it is a state law that would be most helpful.
I understand your fear completely. I think of these laws literally as a mine field. Trip one up and all roads lead straight to prison. Things have become far beyond ridiculous and one can certainly never be too careful.

Let us not look back in anger or forward in fear, but around in awareness~